Variations of Individualism and Collectivism Within Individuals: The Effects of Value Orientations Towards Family, Friends and Work

Nguyen Huu An

Abstract


Individualism-Collectivism is a commonly used dimension in comparative cultural studies. The performance of individualism and collectivism has been found diverse at different levels of analysis. While the constructs are seen as opposite poles of a bipolar dimension at the national level, they are demonstrated as independent concepts at the individual level. Recent debates have suggested these constructs should be treated as individual states in relation to social contexts rather than individual traits at the individual level of analysis. This perspective allows us to explain possibilities for any individual to have both individualistic and collectivistic attitudes. Based on the data of three latest waves of World Values Survey, this paper tests the variations of individualism and collectivism at the individual level under effects of value orientations toward key social relations that individuals involved in, namely family, friends and work. Furthermore, the differences in the effects between the “West” and the “East” and how it changes over time are also taken into account. The findings show that individualism is emphasized among individuals who place work as important, which is stronger in the “West” than in the “East” but not clear over time. Collectivism is favored among individuals who consider family and friends significant, and these links are found stronger in the “East” than in the “West”. Especially, individuals’ preference for the value towards family has negative effects on individualism but positive impact on collectivism and these links are evident over the three waves.  

Received 17th October 2017; Revised 27th March 2018; Accepted 30th April 2018


Keywords


Comparative Cultural Studies; Individualism; Collectivism; Social Values.

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. 2005. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political analysis, 14 (1): 63-82.

Chan, W. T. 1963. trans. and comp., A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy.

Gelfand, M. J., Triandis, H. C., & CHAN, D. K. S. 1996. Individualism versus collectivism or versus authoritarianism?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26 (3): 397-410.

Green, E. G., Deschamps, J. C., & Paez, D. 2005. Variation of individualism and COL within and between 20 countries a typological analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36 (3): 321-339.

Heath, A., Fisher, S., & Smith, S. 2005. The globalization of public opinion research. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 8: 297-333.

Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.

World Values Survey. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org, August 1st, 2017 9:15 GMT + 7.

Kim, R., & Coleman, P. T. 2015. The Combined Effect of individualism–Collectivism on Conflict Styles and Satisfaction: An Analysis at the Individual Level. Peace and Conflict Studies, 22 (2): 137-159.

Lonner, W. J., Berry, J. W., & Hofstede, G. H. 1980. Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values.

Lu, L., Gilmour, R., & Kao, S. F. 2001. Cultural values and happiness: An East-West dialogue. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4): 477-493.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98 (2), 224.

Maznevski, M. L., Gomez, C. B., DiStefano, J. J., Noorderhaven, N. G., & Wu, P. C. 2002. Cultural dimensions at the individual level of analysis the cultural orientations framework. International journal of cross-cultural management, 2 (3): 275-295.

Nisbett, R. 2010. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently... and. Simon and Schuster.

Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. 2002. Rethinking individualism and COL: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.

Schwartz, S. H. 1990. Individualism-Collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 21 (2): 139-157.

Shavitt, S., Torelli, C. J., & Riemer, H. 2010. Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism. Advances in culture and psychology Vol, 1: 309-350.

Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, E. J. 1984. Does the concept of person vary cross-culturally. I Schweder, RA, LeVine, RA (red.): Culture theory. Essays on mind, self, and emotion.

Tjosvold, D., Law, K. S., & Sun, H. F. 2003. Collectivistic and individualistic values: Their effects on group dynamics and productivity in China. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12 (3): 243-263.

Tong, R. L. (1991). Handshakes across the sea: Cross-cultural negotiating for business success. Organizational Dynamics, 19(3), 30-40.

Triandis, H. C. 1989. The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96(3), 506.

Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism.

Triandis, H. C. 1995. Individualism & Collectivism. Westview Press.

Trompanaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture. London: Brcalcy.

Yoon, K. I. 2010. Political culture of individualism and collectivism (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/vjossh.v4i2.350

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


=====================================================

TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC XÃ HỘI VÀ NHÂN VĂN

Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn

Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội

ISSN 2354-1172