National Identity in Southeast Asia: A Critique on Anthony Reid’s work

Phan Quang Anh

Abstract


Southeast Asia is a changing region. In terms of Nationalism, a modern and dynamic Southeast Asia has sought for a re-determination of its post-colonial status and expressed an endeavor building up a coherent entity by forming a nation block, the ASEAN. Many scholars have touched upon this topic by approaching it from various perspectives, with or without considering its indigenous agency which is unique for its context. Anthony Reid seems to be among those who stand on the side of people who dissect the contested nature of identity in Southeast Asia today through a fusion of external factors-western colonialism and internal factors. Through a content analysis of his recent book on this matter, this paper aims to clarify his view as well as point out some issues in his arguments which should be seen through a wider lens.


Keywords


Nationalism; national identity; Southeast Asia; colonialism; post-colonial period

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Anthony D. Smith. 1995. “Nations and their pasts”, in Anthony D. Smith & Ernest Gellner, The Warwick Debates, 24 October 1995.

Anthony Reid. 2010. Imperial Alchemy: Nationalism and Political Identity in Southeast Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).

Benedict Anderson. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1991).

Chua Beng Hoat and Eddie C.Y. Kuo. 1990. “The Making of a New Nation: Cultural Construction and National Identity in Singapore”, paper present at the “Cultural Policy and National Identity workshop” at East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 1990, pp. 1-36.

Damien Kingsbury. 2006. “Analysis: Aceh’s non-federation with Indonesia”, Journal of Federations, Vol. 5, No.2, March/April 2006, pp. 25-26.

Eric J. Hobsbawm. 1983. The invention of tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).

Eric J. Hobsbawm. 1992. Nations and nationalism since 1780: programme, myth, reality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).

Ernest Gellner. 1995. “Do nations have navels?”, in Anthony D. Smith & Ernest Gellner, The Warwick Debates, 24 October 1995.

James C. Scott. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia (New haven: Yale University Press, 2009).

Oxford Dictionaries. “Definition of National Identity in English”.

Stein Tonnesson and Hans Antlov. 1998. Asian Forms of the Nation (Richmond: Curzon Press, 1998).

Stein Tonnesson. 2011. “Imperial Alchemy by Anthony Reid”, Journal of Pacific Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 2, June 2011, pp. 383-384.

Thomas Hylland Ericksen. 2006. “Nations in cyberspace”, the Ernest Gellner lecture delivered at the ASEN Conference, LSE 27 March 2006, pp. 1-18.

Thongchai Winichakul. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-body of a Nation (Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press, 1994).

Vincent Houben. 2006. “Southeast Asian History: The Search for New Perspectives”, in Cynthia Chou and Vincent Houben (eds.), Southeast Asian Studies: Debates and New Directions (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2006), pp. 140-161.

Wilhelm G. Solheim. 1985. “Southeast Asia: What’s in a Name?, Another Point of View”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 16, 1 (1985), pp. 141-147.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/vjossh.v2i2.57

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


=====================================================

TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC XÃ HỘI VÀ NHÂN VĂN

Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn

Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội

ISSN 2354-1172