Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies: Implications for Living Together in Vietnam

John Berry

Abstract


There is probably no more serious challenge to social stability and cohesion in the contemporary world than the management of intercultural relations within culturally plural societies.  Successful management depends on many factors including a research-based understanding of the historical, political, economic, religious and psychological features of the groups that are in contact. The core question is “How shall we all live together?”  In the project reported in this paper, we seek to provide such research by examining three core psychological hypotheses of intercultural relations (multiculturalism, contact and integration) in 17 culturally plural societies. The main goal of the project is to evaluate these three hypotheses across societies in order to identify some basic psychological principles that may underlie intercultural relations. The eventual goal is to employ the findings to propose some policies and programmes that may improve the quality of intercultural relationship globally. The empirical findings in these 17 societies generally support the validity of the three hypotheses. Implications for the development of policies and programmes to enhance the quality of intercultural relations are discussed.

Received 30 March 2018; Revised 20 April 2018; Accepted 28 April 2018


Keywords


Acculturation; Acculturation strategies; Assimilation; Integration; Separation; Marginalization; Contact; Security; Intercultural relations; Multiculturalism; Policy; Universals.

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Abu Raaya, H. & Sam, D.L. 2017. Is integration the best way to acculturate? A re-examination of the bicultural-adaptation relationship in the ICSEY data set using the bilineal method. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 48: 287-293.

Ben-Shalom, U. & Horenczyk, G. 2013. Acculturation orientations: A facet theory perspective on the bidimensional model. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 36: 176 – 188.

Berry, J.W. 1980. Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings. (pp.9-25). Boulder: Westview Press.

Berry, J.W. 1984. Multicultural policy in Canada: A social psychological analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 16: 353 370.

Berry, J.W. 1989. Imposed etics, emics, derived etics: The operationalization of a compelling idea. International Journal of Psychology 24: 721-735.

Berry, J.W. 1997. Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review 46: 5-68.

Berry, J.W. 2003. Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. Chun, P. Balls-Organista, & G. Marin (Eds). Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement and application (pp. 17-37). Washington: APA Books.

Berry, J.W. 2005. Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29: 697-712.

Berry, J.W. 2006. Attitudes towards immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 30: 719-734.

Berry, J.W. Phinney, J.S, Sam, D.L. & Vedder, P. (Eds.) 2006a. Immigrant youth: Acculturation, identity and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review 55: 303-332.

Berry, J.W. Phinney, J.S, Sam, D.L. & Vedder, P.(Eds) 2006b. Immigrant youth in cultural transition. Acculturation, identity and adaptation across national contexts. Mahwah: LEA.

Berry, J. W. & Sabatier, C. 2011. Variations in the assessment of acculturation attitudes: Their relationships with psychological wellbeing. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 35: 658-669.

Berry, J.W. 2013. Achieving a global psychology. Canadian Psychology 54: 55 – 61.

Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y.H., Breugelmans, S.M., Chasiotis, A. & Sam, D.L. 2011. Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. (3rd edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Berry, J.W. 2015. Intercultural adaptation. Paper presented to Canadian Psychological Association Conference, Ottawa.

Berry, J.W., Sam, D.L. 2013 Accommodating cultural diversity and achieving equity: Psychological dimensions of multiculturalism. European Psychologist 18 (3): 151 - 157

Bourhis, R., Moise, C., Perrault, S. & Senecal, S. 1997. Towards an interactive acculturation model. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369-386.

Branscombe, N. R., Schmitt, M. T., & Harvey, R. D. 1999. Perceiving pervasive discrimination among African Americans: Implications for group identification and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 135–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.135.

Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R. & Griffin, A. 1985. The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 49: 71-75.

Dona, G. & Berry, J.W. 1994. Acculturation attitudes and acculturative stress of Central American refugees in Canada. International Journal of Psychology: 29: 57-70.

Government of Canada 1971. Multicultural Policy: Statement to House of Commons. Ottawa.

Graves, T. D. 1967. Psychological acculturation in a tri-ethnic community. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 23: 337–350.

Hewstone, M. & Swart, H. 2011. Fifty-odd years of inter-group contact: From hypothesis to integrated theory. British Journal of Social Psychology 50: 374-386.

Horenczyk, G., Jasinskaya- Lahti, I, Sam, D.L. & Vedder, P. 2013. Mutuality in acculturation: Toward integration. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie 221: 205–21.

Jetten, J., Branscombe, N., Haslam, A., et. al. 2015. Having a lot of a good thing: Multiple important group memberships as a source of self-esteem. PLOS ONE DOI:10.1371/journal.pone. May 27, 201.

Leong, C-H & Berry, J.W. 2009 (Eds). Intercultural relations in Asia: Migrating talents; Globalizing cities. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

Musso, P., Inguglia C., Lo Coco A., Albiero, P., Berry, J. W. 2016. Mediating and moderating processes in the relationship between multicultural ideology and attitudes towards immigrants in emerging adults. International Journal of Psychology. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12290

Nguyen, A.-M. D., &; Benet-Martinez, V. 2013. Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 44: 122–159.

Pettigrew, T. & Tropp, L. 2011. When groups meet. London: Psychology Press.

Putnam, R. D. 2007. Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Science, 30, 137-174.

Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M.J. 1936. Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist 38, 149-152

Riek, B., Mania, E. & Gaertner, S. 2006. Intergroup threat and outgroup attitudes: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review 10: 336 - 353.

Rosenberg, M. 1965. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ryder, A., Alden, L. & Paulhus, D. 2000. Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: 79: 49-65.

Sam, D. L & Berry, J.W (Eds) 2016. Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sirin, S. R., Ryce, P., Gupta, T., & Rogers-Sirin, L. 2013. The role of acculturative stress on mental health symptoms for immigrant adolescents: A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 49(4), 736-748

Stephan, W., Lausanne, R., Esses, V., Stephan, C. & Martin, T. 2005. The effects of feeling threatened on attitudes towards immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 29, 1-20

Tropp, L. R., Mazziotta, A., & Wright, S. C. 2016. Recent developments in intergroup contact research: Affective processes, group status, and contact valence. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds), Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 463-481). Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

Ward, C. 1996. Acculturation. In D. Landis & R. Bhagat (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (2nd ed., pp. 124-147). Newbury Park: Sage.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/vjossh.v4i2.349

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


=====================================================

TẠP CHÍ KHOA HỌC XÃ HỘI VÀ NHÂN VĂN

Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn

Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội

ISSN 2354-1172